Practically no one looks forward to a tax deadline, but Democrats may have special reason to worry about the one they face next year. That’s when an Obamacare design problem slaps its participants with a financial penalty for failing to forecast their incomes correctly.
The Affordable Care Act has many hidden nooks and crannies, some created by poor planning and design, some purposely built in. One such pocket will come fully to light for some consumers after they file their 2014 tax returns. What voters see will almost certainly not please them.
Many Americans – hundreds of thousands, according to The Wall Street Journal – face the risk of losing or needing to repay their federal insurance subsidies next year. For many, if not most, the fact that they owe the government will come as a surprise, and so will the amount.
The mechanism as designed works like this. People who signed up through the federal or state exchanges generally saw the price of the plan they selected as a single, net figure. For those who the system identified as eligible, this figure was the price after tax subsidies (also called advanced premium tax credits) were deducted from the gross price. These are the subsidies at question in the current situation, not to be confused with Silver Plan Cost-Sharing subsidies, which operate slightly differently.
Consumers can choose to take tax subsidies immediately, or wait and receive a credit when filing their tax return. For those who take it at the time of enrollment, the government pays the credit to the taxpayer’s insurance company, reducing the price of premiums. Incidentally, this option created a lower sticker price for many of the people comparing insurance plans on the exchanges.
Eligibility for this subsidy is largely based on self-reported income estimates for 2014 income. But people don’t always know exactly what they will make in the coming year. When people file their 2014 returns – potentially as late as Oct. 15, 2015, if they get an extension – this is the first opportunity for the government to verify their real 2014 income figures.
In some cases, the government then says, “Oops.” People who received larger subsidies than they should have on the basis of their actual income must repay the difference. Repayment liability is limited for certain lower-income taxpayers, but those who don’t fall within the income boundaries are on the hook for the entire amount. If you file in October, you almost certainly won’t even hear about this debt until 2016.
Affordable Care Act supporters say this isn’t a problem, because the Internal Revenue Service just withholds the reclaimed subsidy from an individual’s tax refund. This assumes everyone is due a significant refund in the first place. What happens, for example, if you lose your job? If you have no withholdings and not enough cash on hand to pay, then the law says the government sends you a bill for the balance due.
For those who know about the mechanism, there are options. Taxpayers whose income rises substantially can attempt to lower their modified adjusted gross income, or MAGI, which is the figure for determining the subsidy.
They can also contact the pertinent health-care marketplace to adjust the estimate if they know that it will be wildly different; this may not prevent having to return part of the subsidy, but it might limit how much. But to take either of these courses, people need to be aware of how the subsidy works. Very few are.
Back in March, Forbes reported on the situation, noting that the law gave IRS claw-back powers for overpaid subsidies. And while taking the credit as a delayed refund is a way to avoid the risk of having to repay the government, it also presupposes that individuals can find enough money to pay the premiums out of pocket in the first place – something that seems unlikely in many cases, considering that those who could afford to buy their own insurance often won’t qualify for the subsidies.
That means that, in order to make Affordable Care Act plans look “affordable,” the government encourages people to roll the dice on their future income, without making clear the consequences for guessing incorrectly.
The problem is one that is baked into the law, and it won’t resolve itself without action. An article in the journal Health Affairs predicted that 73.3% of exchange eligible Californians will have income changes of over 10% from year to year. The study’s authors also forecast that nearly 40% of recipients must pay back some of their subsidy, and around 9% must return the entire value of the credit.
The study notes that, while updating information may help a few people in this situation, many still face substantial bills. Though regions vary in their particular numbers, this issue is clearly a significant one for the country as a whole.
In all likelihood, as this situation boils up in 2016, there will be great pressure on the Democrat in the White House, and the remaining Democrats in Congress, to defer or forgive these debts. Thus the subsidy gap is primed to become yet another hidden costs of an unworkable Affordable Care Act design. In this case, however, the cost was hidden purposely. The government made a conscious choice not to provide greater clarity about insurance pricing, to make the Affordable Care Act look more affordable.
But a day of reckoning is coming. Fittingly enough, it will arrive on Tax Day next year when Americans discover that, just like death and taxes, the truth eventually finds all of us.
Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.
Larry M. Elkin, CPA, CFP, is president of Palisades Hudson Financial Group LLC and Palisades Hudson Asset Management, L.P., in Scarsdale, N.Y.
AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.